2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15779
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
WEDNESDAY , THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.2659 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 428/2019 of II ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT COURT,TRIVANDRUM
CRIME NO.21/2018 OF Nedumangad Excise Circle Office ,
Thiruvananthapuram
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
1
GAFOOR,
AGED 43 YEARS,
S/O.SHAHUL HAMEED, TC 39/1832, KARIMADOM COLONY,
CHALA, MANACAUD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2
SATHI KUMAR,
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O.THANKAPPAN, MELE MANJAMKUZHI VEEDU, AMARAVILA,
NADOORKOTTA, KOLLA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3
BIJU.
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O.SUKUMARAN, MUNDAYAKKAVILA VEEDU, KANTHALLOOR,
KARODE VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4
ISAKKI MUTHU @ KANNAN
AGED 25 YEARS
S/O.GANESAN, FLAT NO.86, RAJAJI NAGAR,
CHENGALACHOOLA, THYCAUD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:
1
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERANAKULAM-682031.
2
EXCISE CIRCLE INSPECTOR,
BA NO. 2659/2019
2
EXCISE CIRCLE OFFICE, NEYYATTINKARA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695121.
3
CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE,
EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD,
THIRUVANANTHPAURAM-695001.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.06.2019, THE COURT ON 26/6/2019 PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
BA NO. 2659/2019
3
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.21/2018 of Excise Circle
Office, Neyyattinkara, now pending as SC No.428/2019 of the Additional
Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram.
2. The allegation of the prosecution is that on 13/8/2018, at about
2.15 a.m., 20 kgs of ganga was seized from the possession of the first
and second accused. Pursuant to further information revealed by
them, 5 kgs of ganga was seized from the possession of the 3rd and 4th
accused. Alleging that the accused have thereby committed offence
punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, crime was
registered. Petitioners are in custody since 13/8/2018. They seek bail.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the
Detecting Officer was the CI of Excise Circle, Neyyattinkara.
Investigation was taken over by the CI of Excise, Excise Enforcement
and Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Thiruvananthapuram, He completed
the investigation and laid the final report. The contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioners was that the above officer was not legally
competent to conduct the investigation and to lay the final report.
According to the petitioners, CI of Excise, Excise Enforcement and Anti
Narcotic Special Squad, was not authorized to investigate into the above
4
crime, which was committed beyond his territorial limits. To support this,
the learned counsel relied on the decisions reported in Saji @
Kochumon v. State of Kerala(2010 (3) KLT 471) and Haridas v. State
of Kerala(2015 (1) KLT 958).
3. Opposing the above submissions, learned Public Prosecutor
invited my attention to SRO No.1514/85 dated 7/11/1985, by which the
Kerala Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules 1985 came
into force with effect from 14/11/1985. It provides for Rules in relation
to the various matters under the NDPS Act. Later G.O.(MS)
No.15/88/TD dated 8/2/1988 was issued by the Government of Kerala
in relation to the re-deployment of the special Squads and Mobile
Squads constituted by the Excise Department. Para No.2 (i) of the
order shows that the Special Squad, Trivandrum was deployed to have
jurisdiction over Trivandrum. It was stated they shall function within the
division concerned. They shall also prevent and detect offences under
the Abkari Act and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
It was provided that, the Squad shall perform any other tasks assigned
to them, by the Assistant Excise Commissioner or any superior authority.
Under the Abkari Act 1077, Kerala SRO No.361/2009 dated 8/5/2009,
the Government had appointed certain officers and conferred them
jurisdiction to perform duties specified under the Act in the area
specified in the notification and to exercise duties assigned on Abkari
5
officer under the Act. Clause c (12) provides that Assistant Excise
Commissioner(Enforcement) Assistant Excise Commissioner,(Excise
Intelligence and Instigation Bureau) Circle Inspector of Excise, Excise
Inspector attached to the Excise Circle Office, Excise Inspector in
charge of the Ranges, Excise Inspector of Excise Enforcement and Anti
Narcotic Special Squad, Excise Inspectors(Excise Intelligence and
Investigation Bureau), Assistance Excise Inspectors attached to Ranges
- to be Abkari Officers in relation to the functions assigned to them by
virtue of their respective post or designation, for the purpose of Sections
31,32,34,35,38,39 and 53 of the Abkari Act and to exercise all the
powers conferred and to perform all the duties assigned on Abkari
Officer under the above sections within their respective jurisdiction.
4. Consequently, the Assistant Excise Commissioner was
competent to entrust into the investigation with officers. It is seen that
in the case at hand, the Assistant Excise Commissioner had authorized
the CI Special Squad to conduct investigation in the above case. It is
clearly shows that CI was authorised to conduct investigation and also to
lay the charge. In the above circ