SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28158

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.N.KRISHNAN, J
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD – Appellant
Versus
T.K. PURUSHOTHAMAN – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.VPK.PANICKER

J U D G M E N T

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the Claims Tribunal, North Paravur in OP(MV)No.418/2002. The claimant, who sustained injuries in a road accident, has been awarded a compensation of Rs.28,200/= with 7% interest. The 3rd respondent insurance company was directed to deposit the amount and get it recovered from respondents 1 and 2 jointly and severally. It is against that decision, the insurance company has come up in appeal. 2. The short point that arises for determination is whether the insurance company can be directed to pay any amount at all in the light of the fact that the vehicle involved in the accident was covered by only an Act only policy. I am afraid that the Tribunal had given an erroneous finding directing the insurance company to pay and recover the amount from the owner and driver. The direction to pay and recover arises in cases where there is a valid insurance policy covering the risk of the person and there is a breach committed by the owner regarding the conditions of the policy or in other words the right to recovery is granted only on breach of conditions of the policy. So far as the present policy is concerned, admittedly it is a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top