SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 52416

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941

M.A.C.A.No.2591 of 2008

AGAINST THE COMMON AWARD IN O.P.(MV)NO.517/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE

MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,KOZHIKODE DATED 07-11-2007

APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS:

1

VALSAMMA CHACKO, W/O.LATE CHACKO GEORGE,

PUTHUPPALLIYIL HOUSE, P.O.KULIRAMUTTY,

KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

2

MILANA (MINOR, REP. BY MOTHER VALSAMMA

GEORGE).

3

GEORGE, S/O.KURIAKOSE,

PUTHUPPALLIYIL

HOUSE, P.O.KULIRAMUTTY, KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

4

ANNAMMA, W/O.GEORGE,

PUTHUPPALLIYIL HOUSE,

P.O.KULIRAMUTTY, KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADVS.

SRI.V.C.JAMES

SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1

M.A.TITTO, S/O. ANTONY, MOYALAM HOUSE,

P.O.VARANDRAPPALLI, THRISSUR.

2

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

BRANCH OFFICE, SEEMA TOWER, MAVOOR AOD, KOZHIKODE.

3

M.A.THOMAS, C/O.M.A.TITTO, MOYALAN HOUSE,

P.O.VARANDRAPPALLI, TRICHUR.

4

VALSAMMA CHACKO, W/O.LATE CHACKO GEORGE.

5

MILANA (MINOR), REP. BY LEGAL GUARDIAN

VALSAMMA CHACKO, W/O.LATE CHACKO GEORGE.

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-2-

6

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

DIVISIONAL OFFICE-II, PB.NO.811,

NOOR COMPLEX, MAVOOR ROAD, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADVS.

SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR

SRI.RAJESH THOMAS

THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

02.07.2019, ALONG WITH MACA.455/2017, MACA.467/2017,

MACA.485/2017, MACA.2592/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-3-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941

M.A.C.A.No.455 of 2017

AGAINST THE AWARD IN O.P.(MV)NO.447/2001 DATED 07-11-2007 ON THE

FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE

APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

1

VALSAMMA CHACKO,

W/O.LATE CHACKO, PUTHUPPALLIYIL HOUSE,

KULIRAMUTTY P.O., KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

2

MILANA,

D/O.VALSAMMA CHACKO, PUTHUPPALLIYIL HOUSE,

KULIRAMUTTY P.O., KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1

M.A.TITTO,

S/O.ANTONY, MOYALAN HOUSE, VARANTHARAPPALLY P.O.,

THRISSUR-680303

2

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

BRANCH OFFICE , IRINJALAKUDA-680121.

3

M.A.THOMAS,

C/O.M.A.TITTO, MOYALAN HOUSE,

VARANTHARAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR-680303

BY ADVS.

SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD

SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY

THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

02.07.2019, ALONG WITH MACA.485/2017, MACA.467/2017,

MACA.2592/2008, MACA.2591/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-4-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941

M.A.C.A.No.467 of 2017

AGAINST THE AWARD IN O.P.(MV)NO.330/2001 DATED 7.11.2007 ON THE

FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,KOZHIKODE

APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

MILANA, D/O.VALSAMMA CHACKO, AGED 26 YEARS,

PUTHUPPALLIYIL HOUSE, KULIRAMUTTY P.O.,

KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.

SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH

SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1

M.A.TITTO, S/O.ANTONY, MOYALAN HOUSE,

VARANTHARAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR-680303.

2

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

BRANCH OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA-680121.

3

M.A.THOMAS,

C/O.M.A.TITTO, MOYALAN HOUSE,

VARANTHARAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR-680303.

BY ADVS.

SRI.JOSHY THANNICKAMATTAM

SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD

SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY

THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

02.07.2019, ALONG WITH MACA.485/2017, MACA.455/2017,

MACA.2592/2008, MACA.2591/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-5-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941

M.A.C.A.No.485 of 2017

AGAINST THE AWARD IN O.P.(MV)NO.354/2001 DATED 07-11-2007 ON THE

FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE

APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

VALSAMMA CHACKO,

W/O.CHACKO, PUTHUPPALLILYIL HOUSE,

KULIRAMUTTY P.O.,KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT

BY ADV. SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH

RESPONDENT/S:

1

M.A.TITTO

S/O.ANTONY, MOYALAN HOUSE,

VARANTHARAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR-680303

2

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

BRANCH OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA-680121

3

M.A.THOMAS,

C/O.M.A.TITTO, MOYALAN HOUSE, VARANTHARAPPALLY

P.O.,THRISSUR-680303

BY ADVS.

SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD

SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY

THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

02.07.2019, ALONG WITH MACA.467/2017, MACA.455/2017,

MACA.2592/2008, MACA.2591/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-6-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1941

M.A.C.A.No.2592 of 2008

AGAINST THE COMMON AWARD IN O.P.(MV)NO.2465/2001 ON THE FILE OF

THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,KOZHIKODE DATED 07-11-2007

APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

1

VALSAMMA CHACKO,

W/O.LATE CHACKO GEORGE, PUTHUPPALLIYIL HOUSE,

P.O.KULIRAMUTTY, KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

2

MILANA (MINOR),

REPRESENTED BY MOTHER VALSAMMA GEORGE.

3

GEORGE, S/O.KURIAKOSE, PUTHUPPALLIYIL

HOUSE, P.O.KULIRAMUTTY, KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

4

ANNAMMA, W/O.GEORGE PUTHUPPALLIYIL

HOUSE, P.O.KULIRAMUTTY, KOODARANHI, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADVS.

SRI.V.C.JAMES

SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1

M.A.TITTO, S/O ANTONY, MOYALAN HOUSE,

P.O.VARANDRAPPALLI, THRISSUR.

2

UNITED INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,

BRANCH OFFICE, SEEMA TOWER, MAVOOR ROAD,KOZHIKODE

3

M.A THOMAS, C/O.M.A.TITTO, MOYALAN HOUSE,

P.O. VARANDRAPPALLI,THRISSUR.

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-7-

BY ADV.

SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKKAD

THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

02.07.2019, ALONG WITH MACA.485/2017, MACA.467/2017,

MACA.455/2017, MACA.2591/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

M.A.C.A.Nos.2591/2008 & con.cases

-8-

P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.

------------------------------------------

M.A.C.A. Nos.2591/2008, 2592/2008

&

467/2017, 485/2017 and 455/2017

------------------------------------------

Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2019.

On 19.08.2000, one Chacko George was travelling from

Ernakulam to Kozhikode with his wife and two minor children in a

car owned by him. In the course of the journey, at Thalor in

Thrissur district, the car collided with a bus which was coming from

the opposite direction. Chacko George, one of his children and the

driver of the car died and others sustained injuries in the

occurrence. The car was also damaged extensively. The wife, the

surviving child of Chacko George and the parents of Chacko

George, thereupon instituted collectively and individually five

proceedings for compensation before the Motor Accidents Claims

Tribunal. One for the loss caused to them on account of the death of

Chacko George, one for the loss caused to them on account of the

death of the minor child, one for the damage caused to the car

in the accident and the remaining for the injuries caused to them

-9-

in the accident. Compensation was claimed in the proceedings from

the owner, driver and insurer of the bus alleging that the accident

occurred on account of the negligence of the driver of the bus. The

insurer of the bus contested the proceedings contending, among

others, that the accident occurred on account of the negligence of

the driver of the car and they are, therefore, not liable to compensate

the claimants. The Tribunal accepted the case put forward by the

insurer of the bus and dismissed the claim petitions by a common

award. The wife, the surviving child of Chacko George and the

parents of Chacko George are aggrieved by the decision of the

Tribunal in the claim petitions and they have therefore instituted

these appeals collectively and individually.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as also

the learned counsel for the insurer of the bus involved in the

accident.

3.

The learned counsel for the appellants

strenuously contended that the accident occurred on account of the

negligence of the driver of the bus and the finding to the contrary

rendered by the Tribunal is unsustainable. It was submitted by the

learned counsel that in the case registered in connection with the

accident at the instance of the owner of the bus, the police came

to the conclusion that the accident occurred on account of the

-10-

negligence of the driver of the car and it is in the light of the said

conclusion arrived at by the police that the Tribunal has accepted the

case put forward by the insurer of the bus. It was contended by the

learned counsel that in a case of this nature, the Tribunal should have

decided the question of negligence independent of the police

investigation. It was pointed out by the counsel that the wife of

Chacko George who was an eyewitness to the occurrence has

deposed before the Tribunal as PW1 that the accident occurred on

account of the negligence of the driver of the bus, and the conclusion

arrived at by Tribunal is without having regard to the said evidence.

The essence of the submissions made by the learned counsel,

therefore, was that the Tribunal ought to have held, based on the

evidence of PW1, that the accident occurred on account of the

negligence of the driver of the bus. It was also contended by the

learned counsel alternatively that the Tribunal should have, at any

rate, found that the drivers of both vehicles have contributed to the

cause of the accident. According to the learned counsel, had that

been the finding, it would have been a case of composite negligence

and in that event, the victims of accident are entitled to claim

compensation from the insurer of the bus as well. The learned

counsel for the appellants concluded his submissions praying that in

the event this court affirms the finding rendered by the Tribunal that

-11-

the accident occurred on account of the negligence of the driver of

the car, having regard to the object of the statutory provisions, the

matters may be re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top