SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6233

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR, K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ
K P HARIS SO IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
VALIYANDIVALAPPIL ABOOBACKER – Respondent


ORDER

K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.

This revision is at the instance of the tenant against whom order of eviction has been passed concurrently by the authorities below under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. When the matter came up for final hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner after making all attempts to persuade us to interfere with the concurrent findings of the authorities below assailing findings under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act, probably on being convinced that we are not moved by the submissions so made, submitted that the petitioner may atleast be granted some time to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled building till 30th of April 2007, without considering the case on merits.

2. We heard the submission of the counsel for the land lord as well. We are of the view that time till 30th April 2007 can be granted to the petitioner to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled building to the respondent/landlord.

Page numbers In the result, we dismiss this RCR. At the same time, we grant the petitioner time till 30-4-2007 to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled building t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top