HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR, K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ
K P HARIS SO IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
VALIYANDIVALAPPIL ABOOBACKER – Respondent
ORDER
K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.
This revision is at the instance of the tenant against whom order of eviction has been passed concurrently by the authorities below under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. When the matter came up for final hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner after making all attempts to persuade us to interfere with the concurrent findings of the authorities below assailing findings under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act, probably on being convinced that we are not moved by the submissions so made, submitted that the petitioner may atleast be granted some time to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled building till 30th of April 2007, without considering the case on merits.
2. We heard the submission of the counsel for the land lord as well. We are of the view that time till 30th April 2007 can be granted to the petitioner to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled building to the respondent/landlord.
Page numbers In the result, we dismiss this RCR. At the same time, we grant the petitioner time till 30-4-2007 to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled building t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.