SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11144

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.N.KRISHNAN, J
SAM B SAHAYAM – Appellant
Versus
L R BEENA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

R.F.A.No.67/2005 is preferred against the judgment and decree of the 1st Additional Sub Judge, Trivandrum in O.S.No.131/1995. R.F.A.No.165/2005 is preferred against O.S.No.173/1995 and R.F.A.No.166/2005 is preferred against O.S.No.175/1995. All these suits were for specific performance of the contract with alternative reliefs for damages and return of the amount.

2. The trial court on a consideration of the entire materials held that the plaintiffs are not entitled to specific performance of the contract, but directed the defendant to return the advance amount paid + cost of construction made by the plaintiffs in pursuance of the contract with 12% interest from the last date of agreement dated 30.9.1994 till the date of suit and at the rate of 6% thereafter. It is against those decisions, the defendant in these cases have come up in appeal.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and also the counsel for the respondent in RFA.No.67/2005. O.S.No.131/1995 against which RFA.No.67/2005 contains the following facts:

The plaintiff and defendant have entered into an agreement for sale with respect to 16 cents of land comprised in Sy.No.156/2-14 of Vilavoorkkal village o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top