SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33241

SANJAY V.P. @ SANJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime

No.91/2019 of Shournur Police Station, Palakkad

District for having allegedly committed offences

punishable under Sections 294(b), 326 & 341 of

IPC.

2.

The prosecution case is that on 22.02.2019

the petitioner had wrongfully restrained the de

facto complainant, abused him and hit him on his

face with a brick, resulting in loosing his tooth

and also sustained abrasions of his body.

3.

It is pertinent to note that even though

the incident had occurred on 22.02.2019, the FIS

was given only on 27.02.2019 and there is no

explanation regarding the delay forthcoming from

the de facto complainant. Even though it was a

grevious hurt sustained by the de facto

complainant by loosing his tooth, there are no

other serious corresponding injuries. Petitioner

has no criminal antecedents. He is willing to co-

3

operate with the investigation. Hence, the

custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not

be necessary.

In the result, the bail application is allowed

on the following conditions:

1.In the event of the petitioner being

arrested, he shall be released on bail on

executing a bond for a sum of 50,000/-

(Rupee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top