SANJAY V.P. @ SANJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime
No.91/2019 of Shournur Police Station, Palakkad
District for having allegedly committed offences
punishable under Sections 294(b), 326 & 341 of
IPC.
2.
The prosecution case is that on 22.02.2019
the petitioner had wrongfully restrained the de
facto complainant, abused him and hit him on his
face with a brick, resulting in loosing his tooth
and also sustained abrasions of his body.
3.
It is pertinent to note that even though
the incident had occurred on 22.02.2019, the FIS
was given only on 27.02.2019 and there is no
explanation regarding the delay forthcoming from
the de facto complainant. Even though it was a
grevious hurt sustained by the de facto
complainant by loosing his tooth, there are no
other serious corresponding injuries. Petitioner
has no criminal antecedents. He is willing to co-
3
operate with the investigation. Hence, the
custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not
be necessary.
In the result, the bail application is allowed
on the following conditions:
1.In the event of the petitioner being
arrested, he shall be released on bail on
executing a bond for a sum of 50,000/-
₹
(Rupee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.