SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25770

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J
SREENIVASAN EMBRAN – Appellant
Versus
ANANTHANKADU RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

First defendant in OS 898/98 on the file of Additional Munsiff Court, Trivandrum is the appellant. Respondents 1 to 9 are plaintiffs. First respondent is residents association represented by its secretary and respondents 2 to 8 are its members and 9th respondent member of general public. The suit was filed under Section 91(b) of Code of Civil Procedure seeking a decree restraining appellant and tenth respondent, from obstructing free movement of the user of the road and the lane, being used by respondents. No steps was taken as against tenth respondent by respondent 1 to 9. Appellant filed a written statement contending that Section 91(b) of Code of Civil Procedure has no application to the case. It was also contended that in front of Nagaraja Temple, there is a small plot of land about 2 cents in extent and it is a puramboke land and this plot is used by the public for worshiping the deities and it is a private temple and appellants used to put up a temporary sun shade in front of Nagaraja temple and it is being removed after the festival season and it is necessary for the convenience of large number of devotees gathering at temple and respondents 1 to 9 are not ent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top