HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MARY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
The petitioner is a widow of a driver, who had retired from
service on 28.02.2002 and later expired on 23.06.2018. The
petitioner has not received the family pension so far, contends the
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondent Corporation.
3. The learned Standing Counsel submits that as per Ext.P1, the
family pension seems to be sanctioned to the petitioner with effect
from 01.07.2018 itself. If the petitioner furnishes a non remarriage
certificate, payment of family pension can be expedited, states the
learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent Corporation to
disburse the family pension with arrears to the petitioner within six
weeks from the date of production of non remarriage certificate by the
petitioner.
The writ petition will stand disposed of.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH,
JUDGE
rmm/30/4/2019
WP(C).No. 12784 of 2019 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.