MUHAMMED KUNHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER – Respondent
The petitioner herein is the holder of an explosive licence. While
certain explosives, crackers etc. were being transported to his shops at
Kannur and Kasaragod, the vehicle was intercepted and about
1091.8 gms of explosives were seized. Crime No.487 of 2019 was
consequently registered arraying the driver of the vehicle as an
accused inter alia under Section 286 of the IPC, 118(f) of the KP Act
and Section 9B(1)(b) of Explosives Act.
2.
The petitioner approached the learned Magistrate and filed
an application seeking interim custody of the explosives which were
seized. He contended that he was having a valid licence. He produced
documents to show that the licence issued to him by the Chief
Controller of Explosives on 18.3.2015 was valid till 31.3.2017 and that
prior to the expiry of the licence, i.e., on 13.2.2017, he had filed an
application seeking renewal of the licence for the period from 1.4.2017
till 31.3.2020. He urged that in view of Rule 112(4) and (5) of the
Explosives Rules, he had a deemed licence as his application for
renewal was pending consideration of the authority. The learned
Magistrate, however, rejected the application hol
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.