2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28060
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
JOSEPHEENA – Appellant
Versus
THOMAS – Respondent
OP (CIVIL) 488/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/5TH PHALGUNA, 1936
OP(C).No. 488 of 2015 (O)
------------------------------
(OS 1061/2013 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA)
PETITIONERS:
---------------
1. JOSEPHEENA AGED 60 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF MOOTHEDATHU JOSEPH & WIFE OF
VAROKKY PAUL, MURIYAD VILLAGE & DESOM
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. MARY, AGED 52 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF MOOTHEDATHU JOSEPH & WIFE OF ARAKKAL
THOZHUTHUMPARAMBAIL EDWARD
KOLOTHUMPADY DESOM, VELUKKARA VILLAGE
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
3. MERCY, AGED 50 YEARS
DAUGHTER OF MOOTHEDATHU JOSEPH & WIFE OF
POTTAHTUPARAMBIL SUNNY
CHRIST COLLEGE JUNCTION, IRINJALKUDA VILLAGE
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SMT.K.MEERA
SRI.BOBY MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------
1. THOMAS, AGED 67 YEARS
SON OF JOSEPH, MOOTHEDATH HOUSE
MURIYAD VILLAGE & DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK
THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680027.
2. XAVIER,, AGED 55 YEARS
SON OF JOSEPH, MOOTHEDATHU HOUSE, MURIYAD DESOM VILLAGE
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680027.
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C).No. 488 of 2015 (O)
------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
---------------------------
EXHIBITP1:TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 22.6.2012 IN OS 1566 OF
2012 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 4.4.2013 IN OS.1061 OF
2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT,
IRINJALAKKUDA.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE 2ND
DEFENDANT FILED ON 6.2.2014 IN O.S. 1061 OF 2013 ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA.
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER DATED 24.1.2015 TO THE
WRITTEN STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2 FILED BY
THE PLINTIFFS IN OS 1061 OF 2013 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA.
EXHIBIT P5:TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1063 OF 2015 IN OS 1061 OF 2013
ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT,
IRINJALAKKUDA.
EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND
RESPONDENT TO EXT. P5 IA.
EXHIBITP7: TRUE COPY OF IA NO 1082 OF 2015 IN OS 1061 OF 2013 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA.
EXHIBIT P8: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND
RESPONDENT TO EXT.P7 I.A.
EXHIBIT P9: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.2.2015 PASSED IN
EXT.P5 I.A.
EXHIBIT P10: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.2.2015 PASSED IN
EXT. P7 I.A.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL.
-----------------------------
// True Copy //
P.A. To Judge.
smp
P.BHAVADASAN, J.
-------------------------------------------------
Original Petition (Civil) No.488 OF 2015
-------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of February, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
The court below dismissed the application filed by the
petitioners for having the Will produced in the suit sent for
expert's opinion on the ground that it was highly belated and it
was a ploy adopted by the petitioners to have the suit removed
from the list.
2. The suit was one for partition. It relates to 50 cents of
property in Survey No.383/2 of Muriyad village. At the time of
hearing the interlocutory application itself 2nd defendant had
mentioned about the Will. He filed the written statement on
07.02.2014 in which he gave details of the Will. Issues were cast
on 13.08.2014. The court below has noticed that there were
several opportunities for both sides to take pre-trial steps but
none did anything. After the matter was sent for mediation and
since the mediation did not materialise, the matter came back to
court on 19.01.2015 and with notice to both parties suit was
O.P.(C) No.488/2015
2
listed to 09.02.2015 for trial. It was then that on 07.02.2015 the
petitioners came forward with the prese