IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 21ST JYAISHTA, 1941
WP(Crl.)No.154 of 2019
PETITIONER:
SHAJITHA SUNEER,
AGED 34 YEARS
W/O. SUNEER, VATTAPARAMBIL HOUSE, AKALAD P.O,
CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 518
BY ADVS.
SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN
SRI.VISHNU BABU
SRUTHY N. BHAT
RESPONDENTS:
1
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
2
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR 680 003
3
DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF,
THRISSUR CITY, THRISSUR 680 009
4
STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
VADAKKEKKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT 679 562
5
SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL PRISON, VIYYUR 680 010
BY ADV. ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION
SRI. K.A ANAS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07.06.2019, THE COURT ON 11.06.2019 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(Crl.)No.154 of 2019
2
[CR]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Nagaresh, J.
Wife of a detenu who is accused in as many as 14
crimes since 2015, seeks to quash Ext.P1 detention order and
to produce the body and set the detenu at liberty, by issuance
of a writ of Habeas Corpus.
2.
The petitioner states that the 3rd respondent-District
Police Chief submitted Ext.P5 report dated 17.12.2018, based
on which her husband Suneer @ Noorudheen has been
detained as per Ext.P1 detention order dated 15.01.2019
issued under Section 3(i) of the Kerala Anti-Social Activities
(Prevention) Act, 2007 ('KAAPA', for short) . The order was
executed on 17.01.2019 and the grounds of detention was
served on the detenu. Ext.P1 order has been passed without
due and proper application of mind, contends the petitioner.
3.
Ext.P1 detention order would reveal that the
following are the 14 cases taken into account for treating the
detenu as 'Known Rowdy' as defined under Section 2(p)(ii)(iii)
of KAAPA:-
1. Crime No.707/2015 under Sections 341,
323 read with Section 34 IPC of Vadakkekkad
Police Station.
2. Crime No.828/2015 under Sections 341,
506(i), 294(b) read with Section 34 IPC of
Vadakkekkad Police Station.
3. Crime No.996/2014 under Sections 341,
323, 324, 326, 506(ii), 427 read with Section 34 IPC
of Vadakkekkad Police Station.
4. Crime No.93/2015 under Sections 341,
323, 324, 294(b) IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
5. Crime No.1507/2015 under Sections
506(i), 308 IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
6. Crime No.924/2015 under Sections 452,
341, 323, 506(i) IPC of Vadakkekkad Police Station.
7. Crime No.1587/2016 under Sections 341,
323, 324, 506(ii) IPC of Vadakkekkad Police
Station.
8. Crime No.52/2017 under Sections 376,
406, 420 IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
9. Crime No.753/2017 under Sections 323,
506(i) IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
10. Crime No.754/2017 under Sections 451,
506(i) IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
11. Crime No.377/2018 under Sections
354(A), 354(D) IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
12. Crime No.605/2018 under Sections 341,
323, 324, 294(b) IPC of Chavakkad Police Station.
13. Crime No.962/2018 under Sections
294(b), 506(i) IPC of Kunnamkulam Police Station.
14. Crime No.923/2015 under Section 353
IPC of Vadakkekkad Police Station.
Among the aforestated, Crime No.923/2015 of Vadakkekkad
Police Station is one suo motu registered by the police.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.Vipin
Narayan argued that an order under Section 3(i) of the KAAPA
is preventive in nature. The order of preventive detention
being subject only to subjective satisfaction of detaining
authority and not being based even on minimal appreciation of
evidence, thorough application of mind by the detaining
authority shall precede. Application of mind by the detaining
authority is a condicio sine quo non. However, it is the
non-application of mind which is writ large and protruding in
the detention order.
5.
To drive home the point, learned counsel for the
petitioner pointed out that Crime No.52/2017 of Chavakkad
Police Station was in respect of an incident occurred on
18.03.2016. This Court granted bail to the detenu in B.A.
No.693/2017 on 06.02.2017 with the following conditions:-
“(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on
his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty
thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for
the like sum to the satisfaction of the lower court
concerned.
(ii)
He shall appear before the investigating
officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every
first and third Saturdays for two months, or till the
final report is filed, whichever is earlier.
(iii)
He shall not intimidate or attempt to
influence the witnesses, nor shall he get himself
involved in any other criminal case.
(iv)
He shall surrender his passport before the
lower court concerned or if he does not have one,
he shall file an affidavit to that effect within five
days of his release.
(v)
He shall not leave the State of Kerala
without the previous p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.