SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3768

M.J.GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
THE THRISSUR CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates:
['M R VENUGOPAL', '', 'SMT DHANYA P ASHOKAN', 'SRI SANTHOSH P PODUVAL', 'SC', 'THRISSUR CORPORATION']

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions to

respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1

representation preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner's

mother and father were cremated in a cemetry attached with

the Mar Mari Sleeha Church and the petitioner has preferred the

representation with regard to the action of the 2nd respondent in

making alterations to the cemetry.

2.

Having heard to the learned Standing Counsel, I am of

the opinion that the application preferred by the petitioner is

liable to be considered in accordance with law. There will be a

direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate

orders on Ext.P1 representation preferred by the petitioner with

-3-

notice to the petitioner, 2nd respondent and any other affecting

parties and to pass orders thereon within two months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

ANU SIVARAMAN

JUDGE

JS

-4-

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1

TRUE COPY REPRESENTATION DATED

22/02/2019 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST

RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2

TRUE COPY ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 22/2/2019

ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST

RESPONDENT.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top