HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
M G ARAVINDAKSHAN – Appellant
Versus
SPEICIAL TAHSILDAR(LA),RAILWAYS NO – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This petition is in challenge of Ext.P5, order dated July 30, 2005 dismissing I.A.No.5121 of 2004 in L.A.R.No.26 of 1994 of the court of learned Additional Sub Judge-II, Thrissur. That was an application filed by the petitioner/claimant for amendment of decree to incorporate interest on solatium which according to the petitioner he is entitled to get in view of the decision in Sunder Vs Union of India (2001(3) KLT 489). Application was opposed by the respondent. Learned Additional Sub Judge dismissed the application observing that claim for interest on solatium was rejected by the Trial Judge, an application under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “the Code) is not maintainable and that at any rate, petitioner is entitled to get interest on solatium only after 19-09-2001 and since the entire proceedings were prior to that day and entire decree was satisfied. Learned counsel contends that the decision in Gurpreet Singh Vs. Union of India (2006(8) SCC 457) clarifying the decision in Sunder Vs Union of India (supra) that interest on solatium is payable from 19-09-2001 is not applicable to cases where application for amendment of judgment and decree under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.