SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46559

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J
U RAMANKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
NANMINDA GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff in O.S.715/99 on the file of Principal Munsiff court-I, Kozhikode is the appellant. Defendant panchayat is respondent. Appellant filed the suit seeking a decree for injunction restraining respondent from demolishing the compound wall. The suit was filed without sending a notice as mandated under Section 249 of Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. Respondent in the written statement contended that suit is maintainable without sending a notice as provided under Section 249 of Kerala Panchayat Raj Act as urgent relief is to be obtained. Learned Munsiff after framing necessary issues and recording the evidence, dismissed suit holding that suit is not maintainable without a notice under Section 249 of Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. Learned Munsiff also found that appellant did not obtain a license to construct the compound wall and therefore is not entitled to the decree. Appellant challenged the decree and judgment before District court, Kozhikode in A.S.237/2003. Learned Additional District Judge on re-appreciation of evidence confirmed the findings of learned Munsiff that suit without notice under Section 249 of Kerala Panchayat Raj Act is not maintainable and confirmed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top