SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2207

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANNIE JOHN, J
RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
SREEDEVI – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Original Petition challenging Ext.P9 order dated 24.06.2015 passed by the Munsiff's Court, Adoor in I.A. No. 1629 of 2012 in O.S. No. 17 of 2009. He has filed the suit for declaration of title and possession and for a prohibitory and mandatory injunction.

2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:

Plaint A schedule property in the aforesaid suit is comprised of

1.20 Ares of land in re-Survey No. 144/1 of Block No. 10 of the Peringanad Village and is obtained by the petitioner/plaintiff vide Sale deed No. 2006/2000. As per the sale deed, the property purchased by the plaintiff has 1.44 Ares (3.5 cents). But after the purchase of the property, the revenue authorities informed the petitioner/plaintiff that he is entitled only to 1.20 Ares (3 cents) and mutation was effected only to the extent of 1.20 Ares. Defendants 1 to 3 in the aforesaid suit having a property to the south of the plaint schedule property. They encroached upon the property of the petitioner and constructed a boundary wall in the north-south direction. The encroached portion was specified as B schedule. When the petitioner questioned the same, it was informed that the re-survey plan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top