SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4228

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
N ANILKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE BRANCH MANAGER    Advocate -SMT SREEKALA KRISHNADAS – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner retired from service of the 1st respondent Co-

operative Bank on 31.05.2017, on attaining the age of superannuation, after rendering a total service of 30 years. At the time of retirement, the petitioner was disbursed with a sum of ₹10,00,000/- towards gratuity. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that, in terms of the policy taken by the 1st respondent Bank with the 3rd respondent Life Insurance Corporation of India, the gratuity amount payable to him comes to ₹13,21,667/-. Though the said amount has already been transferred by the Life Insurance Corporation to the 1st respondent Bank, as evident from Ext.P1 communication dated 12.06.2017 of the 3rd respondent, the 1st respondent Bank decided to pay the petitioner only a sum of ₹10 lakhs as gratuity, for the time being, in the light of Circular No.5/2016 issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned counsel for the respondent Bank representing respondents 1 and 2.

3. The issue raised in this writ petition regarding the entitlement of the employees of the Co-operative Societies covered by the provisions under th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top