SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26280

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
V P ABDUL KAREEM – Appellant
Versus
MEHROOF MANALODY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner in this petition challenging the order passed by the 3rd Additional Sub Judge, Kozhikode in I.A.No.2897/2016 in O.S.No.366/12 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. It is alleged in the petition that the respondent herein filed Ext.P1 suit as O.S.366/2012 on the file of the 3rd Additional Sub Court, Kozhikode for realisation of ₹`81,87,328/- with interest. The amount was claimed on the basis of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the parties. Along with the suit, he had filed an affidavit as contemplated under Section 26(2) read with Order 6 Rule 15(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to the petitioner, in the suit as well as in the affidavit, the respondent had stated that he is filing the suit for and on behalf of the company as chairman and managing director of M/s.Glosoft Technology Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 written statement denying the allegations and liability to pay the amount claimed in the plaint. Ext.P3 is an affidavit filed by the respondent along with an application to amend the plaint in which he had described him as chairman and managing director of the company and by virtue of this amendment, he w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top