SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6982

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
HARUN-UL-RASHID, J
BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MANIKUTTAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
AYYAPPAN PILLAI RAVENDRAN NAIR – Respondent


ORDER

By judgment dated 23.10.2009 this Court set aside the judgment and decree under appeal and remanded the case for denovo consideration. As an interim arrangement, this Court also ordered that the state of affairs as of now shall continue till the disposal of the suit after remand and that the persons who are in charge of the administration and management of the temple are at liberty to utilise the income including the interest accrued on fixed deposits for meeting the expenses in connection with the administration of the temple.

The present review petition is filed by the review petitioners who are appellants 3 to 4, 6 to 10, 13 to 17, 20 to 22 and 25 in the appeal .The review petitioners are seeking a clarification to the judgment of this Court, regarding the operation of accounts and also regarding the persons who are in charge of administration and management of the temple. No doubt what is referred in the last paragraph of this Court's judgment is that the Committee in management of the temple can administer the day to day affairs of the temple by spending amounts necessary and that if further sum is required for any developmental purposes or the like purposes the Manging Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top