HIGH COURT OF KERALA
HARUN-UL-RASHID, J
BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MANIKUTTAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
AYYAPPAN PILLAI RAVENDRAN NAIR – Respondent
ORDER
By judgment dated 23.10.2009 this Court set aside the judgment and decree under appeal and remanded the case for denovo consideration. As an interim arrangement, this Court also ordered that the state of affairs as of now shall continue till the disposal of the suit after remand and that the persons who are in charge of the administration and management of the temple are at liberty to utilise the income including the interest accrued on fixed deposits for meeting the expenses in connection with the administration of the temple.
The present review petition is filed by the review petitioners who are appellants 3 to 4, 6 to 10, 13 to 17, 20 to 22 and 25 in the appeal .The review petitioners are seeking a clarification to the judgment of this Court, regarding the operation of accounts and also regarding the persons who are in charge of administration and management of the temple. No doubt what is referred in the last paragraph of this Court's judgment is that the Committee in management of the temple can administer the day to day affairs of the temple by spending amounts necessary and that if further sum is required for any developmental purposes or the like purposes the Manging Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.