SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38134

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.T.SANKARAN, P.UBAID, JJ
C P PAUL – Appellant
Versus
LALU PAULSON    Advocate - SRI S R DAYANANDA PRABHU ,CAVEATOR SRI S R DAYANANDA PRABHU CAVEATOR – Respondent


O R D E R

Ubaid,J.

A tenant having a multi-storied building with a total space of 30,000 sq.ft, in his possession, would not stop his fight against the landlord in his cause for recovery of his own building having a space of 1200 sq.ft for his own purpose. The Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) was introduced in Kerala with the social object of protecting tenants from unscrupulous and arbitrary eviction, while protecting the interests of landlords. The tenants who have ceased to occupy the tenanted premises or who have handed over the tenanted premises under any sort of arrangement which is not authorised by the contract of lease, will not get the protection under the Act. The defences available to tenants under the Act in the proceedings brought for eviction by landlords, can be availed only by those tenants who continue in the tenanted premises, actually occupying the premises. Unscrupulous tenants who would try to continue in the premises by all means possible, even when they have ceased to occupy the premises, or have otherwise handed over the premises to somebody, would not get the benefit of the protection under the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top