SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44797

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, P.V.ASHA, JJ
HADIA FIRDOUSE – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL VAHAB @ VAHAB – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramachandran Nair, J.

This Original Petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Exts.P1 and P2 orders passed by the Family Court, Ernakulam, in I.A.No.4508 of 2013 and 4509 of 2013 in O.P.No.159 of 2010.

2. By Ext.P1 order, the learned Judge ordered to send two greeting cards alleged to have been sent by the petitioner herein to the respondent herein and an authorisation letter dated 13.08.2009, requesting to conduct the petitioner's `Nikah' with the petitioner and to examine her signature and thumb impression with admitted signature and thumb impression and handwritings for examination by a Handwriting Expert. By Ext.P2 order the court ordered to send the photographs marked as Exts.B1 to B8 and B11 and B10 series e-mail communications to CDAC, with its original photos and negatives of Exts.B1 to B8 and B11 and B10. CD if any.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Alan Papali mainly raised the following contentions:- It is submitted that the respondent has not established any convincing case for sending the documents and photographs for expert's examination. It is submitted that these were shown to the petitioner when she was cross-examined and she denied the sugg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top