HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, P.V.ASHA, JJ
HADIA FIRDOUSE – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL VAHAB @ VAHAB – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
This Original Petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Exts.P1 and P2 orders passed by the Family Court, Ernakulam, in I.A.No.4508 of 2013 and 4509 of 2013 in O.P.No.159 of 2010.
2. By Ext.P1 order, the learned Judge ordered to send two greeting cards alleged to have been sent by the petitioner herein to the respondent herein and an authorisation letter dated 13.08.2009, requesting to conduct the petitioner's `Nikah' with the petitioner and to examine her signature and thumb impression with admitted signature and thumb impression and handwritings for examination by a Handwriting Expert. By Ext.P2 order the court ordered to send the photographs marked as Exts.B1 to B8 and B11 and B10 series e-mail communications to CDAC, with its original photos and negatives of Exts.B1 to B8 and B11 and B10. CD if any.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Alan Papali mainly raised the following contentions:- It is submitted that the respondent has not established any convincing case for sending the documents and photographs for expert's examination. It is submitted that these were shown to the petitioner when she was cross-examined and she denied the sugg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.