HIGH COURT OF KERALA
HARUN-UL-RASHID, J
JOY JORPHY – Appellant
Versus
THANKAMMA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal is directed against judgment and decree in A.S.
No. 377/2007 on the file of the District Court Kottayam which arises from the decree and judgment in O.S. No. 446/2006 on the file of the Additional Munsiff Court,Kottayam. The suit was filed by the respondent herein as plaintiff for setting aside the sale deed No.2682 of 1996. The trial court decreed the suit and cancelled the said document and granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the plaint schedule property or from creating encumbrance or committing any sort of waste there in. The trial also declared that the plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit. The judgment and decree passed by the trial court was confirmed by the lower appellate court. Hence this Second Appeal. The defendant in the suit is the appellant herein. The parties hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff is the mother of the defendant.
2. Admittedly, the plaint schedule property and building belongs to the plaintiff . At the time of execution of Ext.A1 sale deed the plaintiff was aged 80 years old and she is now aged more than 92 years.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.