SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37800

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
B.KEMAL PASHA, J
SHINE VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
FR JOSHY PUTHUVA – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct an investigation on Ext.P1 complaint after registering an FIR, in accordance with law. The petitioner says that he is a member of Ernakulam – Angamly Arch Diocese. Further, the petitioner has a case that the Diocese itself is considered as a constructive public trust. According to the petitioner, the administration of the Diocese, including the alienation of ecclesiastical properties are being carried out as per the provisions of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, (for short, Code of Canons) and also the local law of the Diocese, (in short, the By-laws).

2. It is the further case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent, being the Arch Bishop of the Diocese, is the trustee of the ecclesiastical properties of the Diocese. The Writ Petition proceeds on the averments that the Arch Bishop of the Diocese is the trustee of the properties of the Diocese. The 4th respondent herein is a Priest and has been serving as the finance officer of the Diocese. The 5th respondent is one of the Pro-Vicar Generals of the Diocese. According to the petitioner, the 6th respondent is a self-declar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top