SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 7992

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.BHAVADASAN, J
S GOWRIKUTTY AMMA – Appellant
Versus
JANAKIAMMA SARASWATHY AMMA -DO – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

It is heartening to note that the parties were able to arrive at a settlement in mediation. The mediation report has been forwarded to this Court. The parties submit that a decree may be passed in terms of the compromise arrived at in the Mediation Centre.

2. After having gone through the settlement arrived at between the parties, there is nothing to show that there is any illegality in the compromise arrived at between the parties. There is no justification to reject the compromise. It is found to be legal and acceptable.

3. In the result, this second appeal is allowed. The judgments and decrees passed by the courts below are set aside and a decree is passed in the following terms:

“1. The respondents 1 to 4/plaintiffs 1 to 4

agree that the prayer in the suit O.S.No.296/1975,

Munsiff Court, Vaikom may be confined to the 47.432 cents on the eastern portion of the plaint schedule property identified as A schedule hereunder and the suit may be treated as not pressed in respect of the western most 18 cents (B schedule).

2. The appellant and respondents 1 to 5 agree that the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.296/1975, Munsiff Court, Vaikom dated 17.12.2003 and the judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top