SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 50122

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P VIJAYI,W/O RAGHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
A P BALAMANI,D/O P K MALATHI,AGED – Respondent


1. The plaintiff filed the suit for a declaratory and mandatory

injunction. The suit was decreed by the trial court. The

decree of the trial court was confirmed by the lower

appellate court. The second appeal is filed by defendants

2 to 6.

2. The plaint schedule property is 10 cents of land with a

school building in it. A school is run in the building. The

property originally belonged to one P.K.Kunhikannan. He

was the father of the plaintiff and Raghavan. Raghavan

died. Raghavan was the husband of the second defendant

and father of defendants 3 to 6. Kunhikannan executed

Ext A1 gift deed in favour of his wife Chirutha and

children. According to the plaintiff, the right of

management of the school was transferred to Chirutha. It

was also contended that the transfer came into effect

even before the gift deed. The plaintiff contended further

5

that item No.11 in Ext A1 gift deed was the plaint

schedule property. The defendant contended that item

No.11 in Ext A1 was a different property in a different

survey number, and not the school compound comprised

in survey No.92/7. Whatever it be, admittedly, till death in

1973, Chirutha was the manager of the school.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top