HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P VIJAYI,W/O RAGHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
A P BALAMANI,D/O P K MALATHI,AGED – Respondent
1. The plaintiff filed the suit for a declaratory and mandatory
injunction. The suit was decreed by the trial court. The
decree of the trial court was confirmed by the lower
appellate court. The second appeal is filed by defendants
2 to 6.
2. The plaint schedule property is 10 cents of land with a
school building in it. A school is run in the building. The
property originally belonged to one P.K.Kunhikannan. He
was the father of the plaintiff and Raghavan. Raghavan
died. Raghavan was the husband of the second defendant
and father of defendants 3 to 6. Kunhikannan executed
Ext A1 gift deed in favour of his wife Chirutha and
children. According to the plaintiff, the right of
management of the school was transferred to Chirutha. It
was also contended that the transfer came into effect
even before the gift deed. The plaintiff contended further
5
that item No.11 in Ext A1 gift deed was the plaint
schedule property. The defendant contended that item
No.11 in Ext A1 was a different property in a different
survey number, and not the school compound comprised
in survey No.92/7. Whatever it be, admittedly, till death in
1973, Chirutha was the manager of the school.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.