SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9337

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
M M MICHAEL – Appellant
Versus
SIBY VETTOM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/12TH MAGHA 1934 RSA.No. 947 of 2008 ( )

-----------------------

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS.75/2003 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.257/2002 of MUNSIFF COURT, PAYYANNUR APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:

--------------------------------------- M.M.MICHAEL, S/O.MATHEW, MANAMBURATH HOUSE, AGED 51 YEARS, TEACHER P.C.MANAKKADAVU, NUCHIYAD AMSOM AND DESOM TALIPARAMBA TALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SRI.SIJI ANTONY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:

----------------------------------

SIBY VETTOM, S/O.DOMINIC, AGED 41 YEARS, P.O.CHUNDA, PULINGOME AMSOM AND DESOM, TALIPARAMBA.

BY ADVs. M/s. R.T.PRADEEP & SRI.V.VIJULAL THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------

-----------------------------------------

Dated this the 1st day of February 2013

J U D G M E N T

The defendant in a suit for money is the appellant. The suit was for recovery of money on the strength of Ext.A1 promissory note dated 17.11.1997. The defendant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top