Vinod Chandran, J

Read order dated 29.6.2018.

“Personal appearance dispensed

with.

2. We have talked to the first

petitioner, who has admitted that the

third petitioner had not signed the

Vakkalath or in the writ petition and

another person, who was working with

the first petitioner, was brought to the

office of the Advocate for the purpose

of signing as the third petitioner.

3. We also interacted with the

second petitioner, who submits that he

had gone to the office of the Advocate

and signed in the Vakkalath and in the

Writ Petition and the first petitioner

was present, but however, the third

petitioner was not present. First and

second petitioners shall file an

affidavit explaining the circumstances

in which this Writ Petition was filed,

within a period of one week.

4. In the circumstances of the

submissions made by the first and

second petitioners, we are of the

opinion that we need not interact with

WP(C).No.7193 of 2018 4

the third petitioner, and we allow the

petition (IA No.10465 of 2018) filed

by the third petitioner to remove him

from the party array.

List after one week as per roster.”

2. We are not happy with the manner in which th