SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 54525

VALLIKAVUNGAL GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
T.N. RADHAKANTHEN THIRUMULPADU – Respondent


Advocates:
['SRI KRISHNADAS P NAIR', '', 'SMT K L SREEKALA', 'SRI V V ASOKAN']

An aggrieved person got himself impleaded as a

party to appeal before the First Appellate Court being

a pendente lite transferee under 3rd defendant and came

up with this appeal aggrieved by the divergent finding

rendered by the first appellate court in a suit for

injunction against tresspass. The question came up for

consideration is whether it is permissible to issue a

survey commission in a suit for injunction simplicitor

against tresspass and what would be the legal effect of

a survey commission plan got prepared through a survey

commission, in the adjudication of issue pertaining to

the grant of permanent prohibitory injunction against

tresspass.

2. It is a suit for injunction simplicitor

against tresspass. A survey commission was issued

presumably on the reason that the existing boundary

separating the property of plaintiff from that of the

defendant was demolished. The properties were lying

without any boundary as on the date of suit except

4

certain portion. In an injunction suit against

tresspass, there is no scope for adjudicating the exact

boundary dividing the property of plaintiff from that

of the defendant by issuing a survey commissi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top