HIGH COURT OF KERALA
CHIRAMEL KUNJAVOO CHAKKUNNY GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR – Respondent
The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order under
the Income Tax Act, approached the 2nd respondent in appeal.
The petitioner also moved a stay application as per Ext.P3. In
fact, the petitioner moved the stay application before the
assessing authority. The assessing authority granted a stay on
condition that the petitioner should remit 20% of the pending
demand.
Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case,
there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of
the stay application within a period of two months, after notice
to the petitioner. Considering the financial difficulty expressed
by the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to pay 1/4th of the
amount demanded as per Ext.P4 on or before 20.03.2018. It
is made clear that the payment as above would depend upon
W.P.(C) No.7842/2018
2
the orders to be passed in the appeal.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
smp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.