SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44814

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
CHIRAMEL KUNJAVOO CHAKKUNNY GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR – Respondent


The petitioner, as against Ext.P1 assessment order under

the Income Tax Act, approached the 2nd respondent in appeal.

The petitioner also moved a stay application as per Ext.P3. In

fact, the petitioner moved the stay application before the

assessing authority. The assessing authority granted a stay on

condition that the petitioner should remit 20% of the pending

demand.

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case,

there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of

the stay application within a period of two months, after notice

to the petitioner. Considering the financial difficulty expressed

by the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to pay 1/4th of the

amount demanded as per Ext.P4 on or before 20.03.2018. It

is made clear that the payment as above would depend upon

W.P.(C) No.7842/2018

2

the orders to be passed in the appeal.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

smp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top