O R D E R

Surendra Mohan, J.

We have heard the counsel for the revision petitioner/tenant as well as the landlord, who has lodged a caveat.

2. The tenant has filed this revision aggrieved by the order passed under Section 12(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). It is not in dispute that no rent has been deposited or paid to the landlord within the time stipulated under the Act. Therefore, we find no infirmity in the order of the Rent Control Court or in the judgment of the Appellate Authority.

3. The counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner needs some time to surrender the vacant possession of the premises to the landlord. It is submitted that since the tenant is in occupation of a residential building, in which, he has been residing with his family, he may be given a breathing time to search out an alternative accommodation.

4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, we are inclined to grant time to the revision petitioner upto 30.9.2016, but subject to conditions. This Rent Control Revision is therefore, ordered as follows :-

R.C.R. No.193 of 2016 (1) The Rent Control Revi