SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24758

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

MONDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018 / 29TH SRAVANA, 1940

WP(C).No. 8528 of 2018

PETITIONER/S:

N.M.VIJAYAN,

AGED 72 YEARS,

S/O LATE N.M. KRISHNAN NAIR,

MANICHIRAKKAL HOUSE,

POOMALA P.O., SULTHANBATHERY,

WAYANAD DISTRICT:673592.

BY ADV. SRI. GEORGE POONTHOTTAM

RESPONDENT/S:

1

THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION,

CORPORATION OFFICE COMPLEX, LMS JUNCTION,

PALAYAM, THIRUVANANATHAPURAM-695033,

REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER.

2

T.L.SABU,

S/O LUKA, THURUTHIYIL HOUSE,

MULLUANKUNNU,SULTHAN BATHERY P.O.,

WAYANAD DISTRICT-673592.

R1 BY SRI. MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC

R2 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW KURIAKOSE

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

08.08.2018, THE COURT ON 20.08.2018 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.8528 of 2018

2

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner

seeking to quash Ext.P3 order of the 1st respondent,

Kerala State Election Commission, dismissing the petition

filed by the petitioner herein, refusing to disqualify

the 2nd respondent, allegedly for the defection committed

under Sec.3(1)(a) of the Kerala Local Authorities

(Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999 (for brevity, 'Act,

1999'). Brief material facts for the disposal of the

writ petition are as follows:

2.

Petitioner and the 2nd respondent are elected

councillors of Sulthan Bathery Municipality in the

election held during November, 2015. Petitioner was

elected as the candidate of Indian National Congress.

The 2nd respondent was elected from Ward No.23 as a

candidate of Kerala Congress (M), a constituent of

Congress led United Democratic Front (UDF). There were

three candidates in Ward No.23, including the 2nd

respondent. The candidates of both LDF and UDF secured

243 votes each, and in the draw conducted, 2nd respondent

was declared elected. In the election, both UDF and LDF

secured 17 seats each out of the total 35 seats. The

remaining one seat was won by the BJP. After the

3

election, a meeting of all elected Councillors of the UDF

was conducted on 17.11.2015, and in the meeting, all UDF

Councillors, except the 2nd respondent attended, and the

petitioner was unanimously elected as their whip. Sri.

P.P. Ayoob and Smt. Radha Raveendran were decided to be

the candidates to the post of Chairman and Vice

Chairperson. A written direction was given to all the

UDF Councillors, directing them to vote in favour of the

above two candidates in the election proposed to be held

on 18.11.2015. However, the 2nd respondent refused to

accept the whip, and hence it was affixed on the front

door of the 2nd respondent's house.

3.

In the meeting held on 18.11.2015, 2nd

respondent cast his vote in favour of the candidate of

LDF, one C.K. Sahadevan, and accordingly, he got 18 votes

and he was declared elected as the Chairman.

Correspondingly, the UDF candidate got only 16 votes. In

the election to the post of Vice Chairperson also, 2nd

respondent adopted the same stand. Therefore, according

to the petitioner, it was defying and disobeying the

direction of the UDF, 2nd respondent supported the

candidate of the LDF, and thereby, the 2nd respondent

committed defection, and by his own conduct, 2nd

respondent voluntarily gave up his membership in his

4

party Kerala Congress (M), and withdrew from the UDF, and

thus 2nd respondent incurred disqualification as provided

under Sec.3(1)(a) of Act, 1999.

4.

The 2nd

respondent has filed a counter

affidavit, refuting the allegations and claims and

demands raised by the petitioner, and in accordance with

the contentions raised before the 1st

respondent.

According to the 2nd respondent, he contested the election

to Sulthan Bathery Municipality not as part of any

coalition, in Ward No.23. The UDF supported the

independent candidate Sri. Prem Sai and not the 2nd

respondent. The declaration given by the 2nd respondent

and the register showing the party affiliation of the

elected members would show that the 2nd respondent

contested and was elected as the candidate of Kerala

Congress (M) and not of UDF. The District President of

the Kerala Congress (M) issued direction to the 2nd

respondent to vote in favour of C.K. Sahadevan, an LDF

candidate to the post of Chairman and Jisha Shaji, LDF

candidate for the post of Vice Chairperson. Therefore,

the 2nd respondent never violated the direction of his

party and he did not do any act of defection. Therefore,

according to the 2nd respondent, the allegations made by

the petitioner against the 2nd respondent in the election

5

petition and in the writ petition filed before this Court

that, a whip was given by the UDF to the 2nd respondent

cannot be sustained under law and facts.

5.

I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top