SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26981

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
K MOHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


ORDER

Though second respondent/complainant is served, there is no response.

2. Request of petitioner is to transfer C.C.No.46 of 2008 from the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Ottappalam to the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Ottappalam . That is a case involving offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Reason stated is that the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-II is situated on the up stair of the building, petitioner is a cardiac asthma patient and is unable to climb the steps every now and then to attend the court. Petitioner made a request to the learned Sessions Judge, Palakkad by filing Crl.M.C.No.3934 of 2010 but that request was turned down by Annexure-5, order. Hence this petition. Learned counsel submitted that in view of physical inconvenience of petitioner to climb the steps the case may be transferred to the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Ottappalam. I have heard learned Public Prosecutor also.

3. I have gone through Annexure-5, order. Learned Sessions Judge observed that there is no merit in the request for transfer and the request for transfer is made in view of s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top