SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37852

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ, PRRAMACHANDRA MENON, J
P.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI

JUDGMENT

Manjula Chellur, C.J.

Appellants before us were writ petitioners before learned Single Judge. This writ appeal is directed against the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 02.11.2009. In brief the facts that lead to the filing of this writ appeal are as under.

2. Apparently, the land of petitioners was acquired by Government way back in 1992. After passing of award, they sought reference under Land Acquisition Act which came to be rejected on the ground of limitation. Though the land acquisition officer referred the matter to reference court, reference court dismissed the reference opining that it was barred by limitation. Aggrieved by the same, writ petition was filed and the same came to be rejected as per Ext.P2 wherein it was opined that the judgment of reference court and judgment of learned Single Judge declining interference with the judgment will not stand in the way of petitioners applying for redetermination of the compensation under Section 28A on the basis of any relevant court award. Subsequently, an application under Section 28A came to be made by petitioners,which came to be rejected by the authority concerned. Aggrieved by the same, they filed W.P.(C) No. 36

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top