O R D E R

P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J.

The subject matter involved in both these Review Petitions is closely interlinked with each other and hence both the cases are dealt with together. Review Petition 730 of 2016 arises from the judgment rendered in W.P.(C)No.18339 of 2011, whereby Ext.P10 order of cancellation of lease over the property having an extent of 483.63 acres has not been intercepted. R.P. 741 of 2016 is against the verdict passed in W.A.No.89 of 2011, whereby the verdict passed by the learned single Judge in favour of the review petitioner, to have survey and measurement of the property concerned has been interdicted and the writ Appeal came to be allowed.

2. Heard Mr. N.N. Sugunapalan, the learned counsel for the review petitioners and Mr. Sandesh Raja., the learned Spl.Govt.

Pleader (Forest) appearing for the respondents at length.

3. The crux of the contentions raised by the review petitioners is that, the Bench was not correct in holding that the Government was not aware of the transfer effected to the petitioner, as the sale deed was registered pursuant to a verdict passed by this Court wherein the Government was a party and that violation of Section 22 of the Forest Ac