SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1112

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
K.J.ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
K.M.JOSEPH – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.ALEX.M.SCARIA, SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN, SRI.P.R.VENKETESH

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit was for recovery of possession on the strength of their title. Item no.1 of the plaint schedule property belonged to the 1st plaintiff and item no.2 belonged to the 2nd plaintiff. It was contended that the defendant trespassed into the plaint schedule property on 20.11.1986 and hence the suit.

2. The defendant denied the trespass alleged and contended that an agreement was entered into between the 1st plaintiff and the defendant as per which the 1st plaintiff agreed to assign 6.50 acres, being the northern portion of the plaint schedule property. On 24-12-1984 as per an oral agreement, a sum of Rs.35,900/- was paid by the defendant to the Ist plaintiff as advance consideration. The balance consideration payable was Rs.1,150/-. It was agreed that on payment of the aforesaid balance consideration, the plaintiffs will execute the sale deed in respect of the said property in favour of the defendant. Pursuant to the said agreement the defendant was put in possession of the said property and he is residing in the house situated in the said property. On 22.8.1986 the 1st plaintiff agreed to execute the document and thus an agreement was prep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top