HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
K.J.ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
K.M.JOSEPH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit was for recovery of possession on the strength of their title. Item no.1 of the plaint schedule property belonged to the 1st plaintiff and item no.2 belonged to the 2nd plaintiff. It was contended that the defendant trespassed into the plaint schedule property on 20.11.1986 and hence the suit.
2. The defendant denied the trespass alleged and contended that an agreement was entered into between the 1st plaintiff and the defendant as per which the 1st plaintiff agreed to assign 6.50 acres, being the northern portion of the plaint schedule property. On 24-12-1984 as per an oral agreement, a sum of Rs.35,900/- was paid by the defendant to the Ist plaintiff as advance consideration. The balance consideration payable was Rs.1,150/-. It was agreed that on payment of the aforesaid balance consideration, the plaintiffs will execute the sale deed in respect of the said property in favour of the defendant. Pursuant to the said agreement the defendant was put in possession of the said property and he is residing in the house situated in the said property. On 22.8.1986 the 1st plaintiff agreed to execute the document and thus an agreement was prep
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.