SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1525

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J
GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
SETHUKUTTY AMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.R.VENKETESH, SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN, SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR, SRI.L.MOHANAN

JUDGMENT

Defendants 2 and 3 in a suit for partition are the appellants. The trial Court granted a preliminary decree directing division of plaint schedule item Nos. 1 and 2 into 7 equal shares and to allot 4 such shares to the plaintiffs jointly and the remaining 3 shares to defendants 1 to 3. Plaint item No. 3 was directed to be divided into 4 equal shares and the first plaintiff was allotted one such share and the remaining 3 shares were allotted to defendants 1 to 3.

2. Deceased Pachi Amma was the grandmother of the first plaintiff. First defendant Pankajakshi Amma is the daughter of Pachi Amma. Defendants 2 and 3 are the children of the first defendant. Plaintiffs 2 to 4 are the children of the Ist plaintiff. Ist plaintiff is the daughter of D1 - Pankajakshi Amma. Plaint items 1 and 2 were allotted to Pachi Amma as per the B schedule to Ext. B4 partition deed of 1118 M.E. corresponding to 1943. Plaint item No. 3 belonged to late Padmanabha Pillai. Padmanabha Pillai died and his right devolved upon his wife and children. The first defendant is the wife and defendants 2 and 3 are the children of Padmanabha Pillai. The first plaintiff is entitled to ¼ share over item No. 3.

3. Defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top