SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 71379

STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
SANTHOSH KUMAR.R – Respondent


Advocates:
GOVERNMENT PLEADER 2) STATE POLICE CHIEF3) DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE HIGHER4) SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, P.C.SASIDHARAN

JUDGMENT

K. Vinod Chandran,J: The short question to be considered in the batch of Original Petitions (KAT) is as to whether the general rule in the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 [for brevity “KS&SSR”], for consideration of merit and suitability for promotion would survive in the context of Section 101(6) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 [for brevity “Police Act”]; only insofar as the penalties in items (a) to (j) of Section 101(4).

2. The challenge before the Tribunal was against the decisions of the Departmental Promotion Committee [for brevity “DPC”] constituted for the purpose of consideration of promotions in the years 2014 to 2018. The applicants before the Tribunal were not included in the select list since they were either under the rigour of penalty or vigilance/disciplinary proceedings pending against them. It was the submission of the respondents/applicants that the rigour of penalty applied to the relevant assessment years, which admittedly relates to three years prior to the year of consideration, cannot be a bar to promotion when the penalty imposed is one of those under items (a) to (j)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top