SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24797

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, CJ, RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J
vs


Advocates:
SRI.P.RAVINDRAN (SR.), SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR, SRI.V.R.RAJESH, SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.), SRI.C.S.DIAS

JUDGMENT

Navaniti Prasad Singh, C.J.

This intra court appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.05.2017 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.21661 of 2016 whereby, the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.

2. We have heard learned Senior Counsel Sri. P. Ravindran for the appellant and learned Senior Counsel Sri. N. N. Sugunapalan, assisted by Sri. C. S. Dias, learned counsel, for the respondent and with their consent, we are disposing of this appeal at this stage itself.

3. The writ petitioner/appellant is a practicing Advocate, who has about 33 years of standing at the Bar. On 29.08.2014, he gave his consent to be designated as a Senior Advocate. This Court considered the matter of designation of the appellant along with nine other proposals in a Full Court meeting held on 19.08.2015 where thirty two Honourable Judges were present. Upon consideration, the Full Court resolved to designate three advocates other than the appellant as Senior Advocates and consequently, in response to queries made by the appellant, this Court through the Registrar General on 30.09.2015 by Exhibit P3 informed the appellant that he had failed to secure two-third

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top