SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40501

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.N.RAMACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL K.R – Respondent


Advocates:
['SRI THOMAS M JACOB', '', 'SRI AKHIL K MADHAV', 'SRI V S SREEJITH', '', 'SRI M S UNNIKRISHNAN']

Devan Ramachandran, J.

This writ petition has been filed by the two

petitioners, the first among them claiming to be the

Secretary of the SNDP Yogam, Aluva Union, said to be a

branch constituted at the Taluk level of the SNDP Yogam;

and the 2nd petitioner, who is stated to be the

Administrator appointed by the SNDP Yogam to administer

the affairs of the Taluk Union.

2.

The constitutive allegations in this writ

petition is that the second petitioner, is now being

obstructed from carrying on his duties as the

Administrator by the members of the erstwhile managing

committee of the Taluk Union and the petitioners assert

that the police have a duty to offer them police

protection in discharge of the functions of the 2nd

petitioner.

4

3.

Even though we have heard the learned counsel

for the petitioners as afore; and even though their claim

is based on the assertion that the 2nd petitioner has been

appointed as the Administrator by the SNDP Yogam, we fail

to understand how they can claim police protection,

because if the 2nd petitioner is obstructed in his

activities by the erstwhile office members of the Taluk

Union, his remedy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top