SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 17325

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1941

WP(C).No.18818 of 2019

PETITIONER:

CORPORATION BANK,

PALLIMUKKU BRANCH, NNC JUNCTION, ERAVIPURAM

ROAD, VADAKKEVELA P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691

010, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.

BY ADVS.

SRI.K.M.ANEESH

SRI.ADARSH KUMAR

SRI.BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM

SRI.DILEEP CHANDRAN

SRI.K.SANTHOSH KUMAR (KALIYANAM)

SRI.SHASHANK DEVAN

RESPONDENTS:

1

SUB REGISTRAR

SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, ERVIPURAM, KOLLAM -

691 011.

2

VILLAGE OFFICER,

VADAKKEVILA VILLAGE, VADAKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM

DISTRICT, PIN - 691 010.

WP(C).No.18818 of 2019

..2..

3

VALSALA KUMARI

D/O. DHASHAYANI, BHADRADEEPAM, VELIKKATTU

PUTHERN VEEDU, GANDHI NAGAR - 201, AYATHIL

P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691 021.

4

RAGHUKUMAR,

BHADRADEEPAM, VELIKKATTU PUTHEM VEEDU, GANDHI

NAGAR-201, AYATHIL P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691

021.

5

SULFIKAR ALI

KALLUMOOTTIL HOUSE, ZAM ZAM NAGAR 9,

PALLIMUKKU, VADAKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM - 691

010.

SR. GP. SRI. P. GOPINATHAN

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 24.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.18818 of 2019

..3..

Advocates:
['K M ANEESH', '', 'SRI K SANTHOSH KUMAR KALIYANAM', 'SRI ADARSH KUMAR', 'SRI BIJU VARGHESE ABRAHAM', 'SRI DILEEP CHANDRAN', 'SRI SHASHANK DEVAN']

The petitioner is a Bank. Petitioner Bank

invoking the provisions under the SARFEASI Act,

sold the secured asset belongs to respondents 3

and 4 in public auction. The 5th respondent is

the auction purchaser. On account of the

attachment created over the land by order of the

Munsiff's court, petitioner is unable to register

the sale certificate.

2.

In the absence of any challenge to the

sale merely citing the attachments the official

respondents cannot deny the petitioner to

register the sale certificate. Though, notice

has been served on respondents 3 and 4, none

appeared for them. This Court in several

judgments held that such attachment has to be

effaced from the records, as it cannot supersede

the superior rights available to the secured

..4..

mortgagor.

3.

In the light of above, the first

respondent is directed to register the sale

certificate forthwith. Consequent upon the

registration of such sale certificate, the

Revenue Authority shall effect mutation in favour

of the purchaser from the petitioner. Needles

to say, all encumbrance shall be effaced from the

register of the Sub Registrar.

The Writ Petition is disposed as above.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

PR/24.07.2019

..5..

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1

TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPER REGISTER

ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2

TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE

CERTIFICATE OBTAINED FROM THE 1ST

RESPONDENT.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top