SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45026

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
JOY C R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


The petitioner approached the District

Collector by Ext.P2 alleging that party respondents

have encroached upon the Government land. In the

light of the fact that Ext.P2 is yet to be acted

upon, there shall be a direction to the District

Collector or any competent authority under him to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 after hearing

the petitioner, respondents 6 and 7 and any other

encroachers within a period of two months. If it

is found that the Government land has been

encroached upon, necessary steps shall be taken to

remove such encroachment strictly following the

procedures under the Land Conservancy Act within a

further period of two months.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

ln

WP(C).No.16650/2018 3

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF KOZHUKKULLY VILLAGE SETTLEMENT

SURVEY REGISTER OF SURVEY NO.126/4 ALONG WITH THE

SKETCH ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED

28/12/2017.

EXHIBIT P2:

THE TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE

PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 DATED

5/1/2018.

EXHIBIT P3:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE

OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 5/1/2018.

EXHIBIT P4:

THE TRUE COPY OF PHOTOG

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top