SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39297

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J
ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, RTA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 8163/2012



The court established that ambiguous regulatory provisions regarding stage carriage operations must be clarified by the authority to ensure lawful compliance.

Headnote:

Transport - Stage Carriage Operations - Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules - Sections 206, 207 - The court analyzed the authority of the Regional Transport Authority over stage carriage routes, determining ambiguity in existing regulations necessitating reevaluation of operational mandates, thereby guiding decision-making processes.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a stage carriage operator, contested a notice to operate from Palayam Bus Stand instead of Moffussal Bus Stand, asserting rights based on a previous judgment and permit regulations.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is required to operate from the Palayam Bus Stand or if continued operation from the Moffussal Bus Stand is permissible under existing regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the existing directive from the Regional Transport Authority lacked clarity, necessitating a reevaluation to ensure fair and lawful operation of stage carriage services.

Final Decision: The court directed the Regional Transport Authority to reconsider the case based on new representation while suspending the enforcement of the notice.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a stage carriage operator operating a stage carriage service on the route Karakkode - Kozhikode - Thottilpalam (via) Vazhikadavu, Nilambur, Areekode, Edavannappara, Pavangad, Atholi and Perambra on the strength of Ext.P1 regular permit, valid till 4.9.2013. The petitioner is presently operating the service as per the time schedule settled by Ext.P2 proceedings dated 24.9.2009, through the Moffussal Bus Stand in Kozhikode town which is otherwise known as the New Bus Stand. Sometime in the year 2004, the Assistant Commissioner of Police (City Traffic), Kozhikode directed the petitioner to operate the service through the Palayam Bus Stand. The petitioner thereupon submitted Ext.P5 representation before the first respondent. He thereafter filed WP(C)No.25545 of 2007 in this Court. By Ext.P6 judgment delivered on 20.6.2008, this Court directed the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kozhikode to consider Ext.P4 representation with notice to the petitioner and other parties and pass orders thereon, within three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is stated that though pursuant thereto, there was no interference by the second respondent and the petitioner WP(C)No. 8163 of 2012 -2-

continued to operate the service through the Moffussal Bus Stand at Kozhikode, the second respondent has issued Ext.P7 notice dated 14.3.2012 informing the petitioner that unless he operates the service thorough the Palayam Bus Stand, action will be taken against him. Hence this writ petition challenging Ext.P7 seeking the following reliefs:

i) to declare that the petitioner's stage carriage KL-08/AE 4707 operating on the route Karakkode - Thottilpalam have to start and halt the service at Kozhikode moffussal bus stand in consonance with Ext.P4 decision of the Regional Transport Authority, Kozhikode and respondents 2 and 3 have absolutely no right or authority to interfere in the said operation of the service;

ii) to call for the records leading to the case and quash Ext.P7 by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order;

iii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to operate his service with halt and start from Kozhikode moffussal bus stand;

iv) to stay the operation and all proceedings pursuant to Ext.P7 enabling the petitioner to continue his service on the route Karakkode - Thottilpalam in respect of stage carriage KL- 08/AE 4707 by halting and starting from Kozhikode moffussal bus stand, pending disposal of the Writ Petition (Civil)

2. The third respondent has on his own behalf and on behalf of the second respondent sworn to a counter affidavit dated 9.4.2012. In WP(C)No. 8163 of 2012 -3-

paragraph 2 it is stated that all buses coming from Medical College side should reach Palayam Bus Stand and set down passengers in the said bus stand. It is also stated that buses proceeding to Ulliyeri and Thottipalam and buses going to the northern side should use the Moffussal Bus Stand, that all buses proceeding towards the southern side through Meenchanda Mini Bye - pass, the destination of which is more than 50 kilometres away can use the Moffussal-Bus Stand, but buses going to Nilambur and Vazhikadavu, via Medical College should use the Palayam Bus Stand. In paragraph 3 it is stated that stage carriage bearing registration No. KL-10-AD-6390 operating on the route Nilampur -Karulayi-via Medical College is reaching Palayam Bus Stand to take in and set down passengers and that buses proceeding to the south through the Mini Bye-pass, Meenchanda, Kondotty, Vazhikkadavu are permitted to start from Moffussal Bus Stand and that buses going via Medical college are not permitted to use the Moffussal Bus Stand. It is stated in paragraph 4 that in the year 2010 a new over bridge was built (Arayidathupalam) and all buses are using this over bridge for reaching the Palayam Bus Stand via

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top