2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39144
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.5289 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 6008/2019 of JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS ,NILAMBUR DATED 04-07-2019
CRIME NO.220/2019 OF Nilambur Police Station , Malappuram
PETITIONER/S:
JAHEERUL ISLAM,
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O. SAMSUL ISLAM, KATHWAGRAM, BARDHAMAN DISTRICT,
WEST BENGAL
BY ADVS.
SRI.GEORGE MATHEW
SHRI.GEORGE K.V.
SHRI.MATHEW K.T.
SHRI.PRAVEEN S.
SHRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G
SRI.DIPU JAMES
SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031
2
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
NILAMBUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 331,
THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM-682 031
BY ADV. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.S.SAJJU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.07.2019,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.5289 of 2019
2
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
B.A. No. 5289 of 2019
-----------------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of July, 2019
['GEORGE MATHEW', '', 'SRI M D SASIKUMARAN', 'SHRI PRAVEEN S', 'SHRI SUNIL KUMAR A G', 'SRI DIPU JAMES', 'SHRI MATHEW K T', 'SHRI GEORGE K V', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
The petitioner has been arrayed as the sole accused in the instant
crime No.220/2019 of Nilambur Police Station. The subject crime involved
in this regular bail application is crime No.220/2019 of Nilambur Police
Station. Initially, the offence alleged in the instant crime is the one as per
Section 307 of the IPC (attempted to commit murder). The prosecution
case is that on 5.6.2019 about 4 p.m., after wordy altercations between the
petitioner /accused and his wife which happened in their house, the
petitioner had poured diesel over the body of his wife and set her ablaze in
his rented quarters at Mukkatta, Nilambur. The petitioner’s wife was
immediately admitted to the hospital and she has given the FIS before the
Police and her FIS was recorded by the Police in the Hospital whereby she
has clearly stated that the petitioner/accused had poured diesel over her
body and set her on fire on 5.6.2019 at about 4 p.m. It is stated that the
petitioner was asked by his wife to purchase provisions for the day and he
had gone outside for purchase of provisions and when he came late, his
wife had question as to why he came so late and the petitioner on being
enraged at his wife questioning him, had poured diesel which has kept in
3
the house, over her body and set fire. Accordingly, on the basis of he said
information conveyed by the victim that the instant crime No.22/2019 of
Nilambur Police Station has been registered on 5.6.2019 at 7.20 p.m.,
wherein the offence alleged therein is one as per Section 307 of the IPC.
Initially, the petitioner’s wife was admitted in Government District
Hospital, Nilambur whereby the FIS was taken and later she was shifted
and admitted to the Government Medical College, Kozhikode on the next
day (6.6.2019). The petitioner was arrested on 6.6.2019 in connection with
the involvement in the above said crime and he was remanded to the
judicial custody by the orders of the Judicial Magistrate Court concerned.
Despite the best treatment given to the lady, she died on 13.06.2019 at
Government Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode. Thereupon, the Police
has altered the offence in the instant crime as the one as per Section 302 of
the IPC.
2.
Sri. George Mathew, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner/accused would strongly urge that even going by the admitted
prosecution allegations, it can be seen that the vital ingredients to
constitute the offence of Section 302 IPC are absent in this case. Further
that no such incident as alleged in the FIS has taken place and that on an
earlier occasion also, the deceased had attempted to commit suicide. This
was informed to her relatives also. That a male child aged 1½ years has
been born to the couple in their wedlock and that there is none to take care
4
of him. Further that, the petitioner has been under judicial custody since
6.6.2019 and therefore his continued detention is no longer necessary. In
the light of these aspects, it is urged by the petitioner’s counsel that the
petitioner may be ordered to release on regular bail subject to stringent
conditions.
3.
Per contra, Sri.S.Sajju, the learned Prosecutor appearing for the
respondent State, would strongly oppose the plea for grant of regular bail.
The learned Prosecutor would urge that going by the specific allegations in
the FIS, the petitioner/accused had poured diesel over the body of his wife
and set her at a place and later, in the process of hospitalization and
treatment, she had succumbed to death on 13.6.2019. In the light of these
aspects, the petitioner has to be attributed with the mensrea that his highly
dangerous action of pouring diesel over the body of the deceased and
setting her on fire is likely to cause death and that the allegations in the
instant crime are very serious and grave and that there is also possibility of
the petitioner to influence the witnesses etc. and this Court may not grant
regular bail to the petitioner.
4.
After hearing both sides, this Court is constrained to take the
view that