SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9645

PRIYAN.V – Appellant
Versus
THE CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM) – Respondent


Advocates:
['U BALAGANGADHARAN', 'SMT ANEETHA A G', 'SC', 'KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED']

The petitioner, who is working as Overseer in the

KSEBL, has approached this Court challenging Ext.P5 order

of transfer, to the extent it transfers the petitioner from

Kuthumunda Sub Station under Transmission Wing to

Meppadi Electrical Section under Distribution Wing.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner had been posted at Kuthumunda Sub

Station only in the year 2018 and that there is no reason to

transfer him. It is also stated that the petitioner has physical

disabilities, which prevents him from carrying out extensive

travel which is required under the Distribution Wing.

Pointing out these aspects of the matter, the petitioner has

preferred Ext.P7 representation before the respondents,

which has been forwarded to the 1st respondent.

3.

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

respondents submits that Ext.P7 representation will be taken

up and considered, taking note of the specific grounds raised

by the petitioner and taking note of the physical difficulties,

which have been raised by the petitioner.

3

In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction

to the 1st respondent to consider and pass approp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top