Back
2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9645
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2019 / 31ST ASHADHA, 1941
WP(C).No.19976 of 2019
PETITIONER:
PRIYAN.V.
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O.M.D.VASU, OVERSEER, KUTHUMUNDA 66 KV SUB STATION,
WAYANAD-673123, RESIDING ILLATH HOUSE, VYTHIRI,
WAYANAD-673123.
BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
RESPONDENTS:
1
THE CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM),
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2
THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,
TRANSMISSION CIRCLE, NALLALAM, KOZHIKKODE, KERALA
STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., KOZHIKKODE-673027.
3
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED, KANIYAMBETTA
PO, 673122.
4
THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
66 KV SUB STATION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
LTD., KUTHUMUNDA, WAYANAD-673123.
BY ADV.A GANEETHA, STANDING COUNSEL, KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.19976 of 2019
2
['U BALAGANGADHARAN', 'SMT ANEETHA A G', 'SC', 'KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED']
The petitioner, who is working as Overseer in the
KSEBL, has approached this Court challenging Ext.P5 order
of transfer, to the extent it transfers the petitioner from
Kuthumunda Sub Station under Transmission Wing to
Meppadi Electrical Section under Distribution Wing.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the petitioner had been posted at Kuthumunda Sub
Station only in the year 2018 and that there is no reason to
transfer him. It is also stated that the petitioner has physical
disabilities, which prevents him from carrying out extensive
travel which is required under the Distribution Wing.
Pointing out these aspects of the matter, the petitioner has
preferred Ext.P7 representation before the respondents,
which has been forwarded to the 1st respondent.
3.
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
respondents submits that Ext.P7 representation will be taken
up and considered, taking note of the specific grounds raised
by the petitioner and taking note of the physical difficulties,
which have been raised by the petitioner.
3
In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction
to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders
on Ext.P7 representation preferred by the petitioner taking
note of the specific difficulties pleaded by him and the
medical certificate produced by him, within a period of two
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN
jv
JUDGE
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY
DR.A.KRISHNADAS, PHYSICIAN, DATED 15.5.2019
TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY
DR.A.KRISHNADAS, PHYSICIAN, DATED 15.5.2019
TO THE PETITIONER'S MOTHER.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF VERIFIED CERTIFICATE DATED
21.5.2019 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
CHUNDEL.
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF ORDER
NO.EB4(B)/OVR(ELE)/GT/2018 DATED 31.5.2018
(RELEVANT PAGES) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
NO.1.
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.EB4(B)OVR(ELE)GT/2019
DATED 31.5.2019 ISSUED BY THE SECOND
RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6
A TRUE COPY OF ELECTRONIC RECEIPT UNDER
HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM OF THE
RESPONDENT BOARD.
EXHIBIT P7
A TRUE COPY REPRESENTATION OF THE
PETITIONER DATED 8.7.2019 WITH DUE
RECOMMENDATIONS SUBMITTED TO 1ST
RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EB07/TDK/19-20
DATED 11.7.2019 ISSUED BY THIRD RESPONDENT
TO SECOND RESPONDENT.
