HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAYIN ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 5186/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/21ST PHALGUNA, 1936
WP(C).No. 5186 of 2015 (W)
-------------------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------------
SHAYIN ISMAIL
S/O.KORAMBAYIL SHOWKATHALI, CHERAKKARA ROAD, MANJERI
MALAPPURAM DISTT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
MALAPPURAM DIST., MALAPPURAM.
3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA),
(GENERAL), MALAPPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T. R.RAJESH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
12-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
DCS
WP(C).No. 5186 of 2015 (W)
--------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND & 3RD RESPONDENTS.
EXHIBIT P2- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE SENT BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER ISSUED BY
THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMMON AWARD NO.2/2014 PASSED
BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7- A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS 2 & 3.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL
---------------------------------------
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C). NO. 5186 OF 2015
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 12th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The compensation is now being offered to the petitioner
pursuant to Ext. P5 award passed under the Land Acquisition
Act, 1894. But no such award could have been passed on
21.08.2014 after the commencement of the Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. All that the
petitioner prays is that the receipt of compensation should not
prejudice his right under the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013.
2.
It is made clear that the receipt of compensation by
the petitioner will be subject to further determination of
compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013. This is in view of Section 24(1)(a) of
the said Act and the receipt of compensation pursuant to
Ext.P5 award will not operate as an estoppel. Needless to say
that a fresh award would be passed under the Right to Fair
W.P.(C). NO. 5186 OF 2015 2
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 notwithstanding
Ext.P5 award.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH
JUDGE
DCS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.