SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39413

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J
K GANGADHARAN – Appellant
Versus
BUDHANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH    Advocate - B RENJITHKUMAR ,B RENJITHKUMAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner owns and possesses 42 cents of land comprised in survey Nos.70/2, 70/2-1 and 70/16 of Ennakkad village. Earlier, the petitioner obtained Ext.P7 D & O licence for establishing and operating a fuel outlet thereon under the Kisan Seva Kendra Scheme. For the purpose of providing amenities to the customers of the fuel outlet, the petitioner constructed a building in the same property covered by Ext.P1 sale deed in terms of the conditions of the aforesaid scheme. After effecting such construction, the petitioner submitted Ext.P9 application before the second respondent for numbering the building. Thereupon, the petitioner was asked to obtain a certificate from the third respondent as per Ext.P11. Subsequently, the petitioner produced Ext.P12 certificate before the second respondent carrying a certification from the third respondent that the W.P.(C).5807/14 2 building in question was not constructed in violation of the provisions of the Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act (Kerala) 2008 (for short the 'Wet Land Act'). Thereupon, the second respondent intimated the petitioner that the entry regarding the description of the property in the BTR is to be correcte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top