HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J
K GANGADHARAN – Appellant
Versus
BUDHANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH Advocate - B RENJITHKUMAR ,B RENJITHKUMAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner owns and possesses 42 cents of land comprised in survey Nos.70/2, 70/2-1 and 70/16 of Ennakkad village. Earlier, the petitioner obtained Ext.P7 D & O licence for establishing and operating a fuel outlet thereon under the Kisan Seva Kendra Scheme. For the purpose of providing amenities to the customers of the fuel outlet, the petitioner constructed a building in the same property covered by Ext.P1 sale deed in terms of the conditions of the aforesaid scheme. After effecting such construction, the petitioner submitted Ext.P9 application before the second respondent for numbering the building. Thereupon, the petitioner was asked to obtain a certificate from the third respondent as per Ext.P11. Subsequently, the petitioner produced Ext.P12 certificate before the second respondent carrying a certification from the third respondent that the W.P.(C).5807/14 2 building in question was not constructed in violation of the provisions of the Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act (Kerala) 2008 (for short the 'Wet Land Act'). Thereupon, the second respondent intimated the petitioner that the entry regarding the description of the property in the BTR is to be correcte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.