SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 22068

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.M.JOSEPH, J
THE THIRUMBADI RUBBER CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JT. COMMR. OF INCOMETAX SPL. RANGE,EKM – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.BALACHANDRAN, SRI.C.P.RAVIKUMAR, ADDL.CGSC SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel Sri. George K. George, appearing on behalf of the Department. It is common case that the question at hand is covered in favour of the petitioner.

2. Petitioner calls in question Exts.P1, P3, P7, P7(a), P9 and P10 orders passed under the Indian Income Tax Act. Apparently the question is whether income derived by the petitioner when latex is converted into centrifuged latex, the manufacturing activity makes the income exigible to Income Tax Act. That matter engaged the attention of the Central Board, which has issued a Circular, which is produced in 261 ITR 158. As per the Circular, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel that in respect of assessments prior to 2002-2003 i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top