SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37213

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
AFSANA – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers :

“(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ directing the Respondent No. 1 to take up Ext. P7 application and to pass appropriate orders on merits, based on the judicial precedents in the interest of justice within a time limit.

(ii) Grant such other and further reliefs as may be prayed for hereafter and deemed fit and proper by this Honourable Court, in the interest of justice including recovery of full costs incurred for the institution and conduct of this writ petition.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P7 application within a reasonable time.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

W.P.(C) No. 9921 2013

4. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the matter on merits. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P7 application, in accordance with law, after giving an opp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top