SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 17196

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
M/S SYNTHITE INDUSTRIES LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

According to the petitioner, petitioner is the owner of 1.21 ares of land in Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, by virtue of Ext.P1 document. It is the case of the the petitioner that the property was converted into a dry land before 2008 i.e. before the introduction of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. It is also the case of the petitioner that even though in the BTR and revenue records, the property is shown as nilam, it is wrongly included in the data bank, constituted under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land & Wet Land Act, 2008, as converted land. Therefore, seeking removal from the data bank, petitioner has submitted Ext. P3 application before the fourth respondent, which is pending consideration. Petitioner has also submitted Ext.P4 application before the first respondent, as per the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order for utilisation of the land for a different purpose other than paddy cultivation. Petitioner seeks direction for early consideration of aforesaid applications.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior Government Pleader, there will be a direction to the fourth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top