HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
BABICHAN MUKKADAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE SB COLLEGE BRANCH REP BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER Advocate - SATHISH NINAN ,SATHISH NINAN – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner availed a housing loan of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the respondent Bank in the year 2010, creating security interest over the property in question. Because of the adverse circumstances, the repayment could not be effected on time, as scheduled, which made the petitioner a defaulter and the Bank proceeded with the steps under the SARFAESI Act, after declaring the account as 'NPA'. This made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing the present writ petition.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the default was never wilful, but because of some frustrating pecuniary circumstances. It is stated that the petitioner is a heart patient and had undergone a major surgery. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earnest efforts are being taken to clear the entire overdue amount and that the overdue amount will be cleared at the earliest, for which some breathing is sought for. It is stated that the petitioner shall continue to effect the payment without fail, simultaneously pointing out that, there is absolutely no dispute whatsoever with regard to the rights and liberties of the Bank. 3. Heard the learned standing counsel for the responde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.