ALTHAF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
The main prayer in the aforecaptioned Criminal Miscellaneous Case is
as follows:-
“............. to allow this Criminal M.C., quashing Annexure I First
Information Report and Annexure II Final Report pending before
the 7th Addl. District and Sessions Court at Ernakulam as SC.
No.797/2018.”
2.
Heard Sri. G. Maheswary, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners, Sri. T.R. Renjith, learned Public Prosecutor for R1 State,
Smt.M.Megha, learned counsel appearing for R2 lady de facto complainant
and Sri. S. Prasun, learned Amicus Curiae.
3.
The petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3
among the three accused in the impugned Annexure-I Crime No.1822/2011
of Palluruthy Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498A,
306 & 34 of the IPC on the basis of the First Information Statement lodged in
that regard on 1.9.2011 by the lady de facto complainant. The 2nd respondent
de facto complainant is the wife of the 1st petitioner (A1). The 2nd petitioner
(A2) is the father of the 1st petitioner (A1). The 3rd petitioner is the
3
brother-in-law of the 1st petitioner (A1). The Police, after investigation, has
filed the impugned Annexure-II final report/charge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.