SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39212

ALTHAF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


The main prayer in the aforecaptioned Criminal Miscellaneous Case is

as follows:-

“............. to allow this Criminal M.C., quashing Annexure I First

Information Report and Annexure II Final Report pending before

the 7th Addl. District and Sessions Court at Ernakulam as SC.

No.797/2018.”

2.

Heard Sri. G. Maheswary, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, Sri. T.R. Renjith, learned Public Prosecutor for R1 State,

Smt.M.Megha, learned counsel appearing for R2 lady de facto complainant

and Sri. S. Prasun, learned Amicus Curiae.

3.

The petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3

among the three accused in the impugned Annexure-I Crime No.1822/2011

of Palluruthy Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498A,

306 & 34 of the IPC on the basis of the First Information Statement lodged in

that regard on 1.9.2011 by the lady de facto complainant. The 2nd respondent

de facto complainant is the wife of the 1st petitioner (A1). The 2nd petitioner

(A2) is the father of the 1st petitioner (A1). The 3rd petitioner is the

3

brother-in-law of the 1st petitioner (A1). The Police, after investigation, has

filed the impugned Annexure-II final report/charge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top